Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: java 17 and general cleanup #1916

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Chore: java 17 and general cleanup #1916

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

robfrank
Copy link
Collaborator

@robfrank robfrank commented Jan 15, 2025

What does this PR do?

Refactor to use more java 17 idioms
Replace most of i prefixed parameters

yes, it's huge, but it contains just cosmetic changes

Motivation

Evolve the code to be ready when we can migrate to java 21

Checklist

  • I have run the build using mvn clean package command
  • My unit tests cover both failure and success scenarios

engine/pom.xml Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+2.49% 52.49%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (f086acb) 68195 43771 64.19%
Head commit (213feea) 64524 (-3671) 43020 (-751) 66.67% (+2.49%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#1916) 2827 1484 52.49%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@robfrank robfrank requested a review from lvca January 15, 2025 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant