Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allocate class instances statically #191

Merged

Conversation

jonathanperret
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathanperret jonathanperret commented Jul 21, 2024

Issue

The classes that make up the AYAB firmware are currently dynamically allocated with new at the top level of main.cpp:

BeeperInterface *GlobalBeeper::m_instance = new Beeper();
ComInterface *GlobalCom::m_instance = new Com();
EncodersInterface *GlobalEncoders::m_instance = new Encoders();
FsmInterface *GlobalFsm::m_instance = new Fsm();
KnitterInterface *GlobalKnitter::m_instance = new Knitter();
SolenoidsInterface *GlobalSolenoids::m_instance = new Solenoids();
TesterInterface *GlobalTester::m_instance = new Tester();

Since these objects are allocated at the start of the program and never freed, there is no advantage to having them dynamically allocated. On the other hand, there are disadvantages:

  • dynamically allocated objects can use a few more bytes for the memory allocator's bookkeeping;
  • the memory used by these objects is not counted in the PlatformIO builder's statistics of RAM usage, that are printed after every build.

That last point in particular can hide the fact that the memory requirements for the firmware exceed the target microcontroller's RAM size (2048 bytes for the Atmega328p on an Arduino Uno).

Proposed solution

This PR replaces the use of new by the creation of statically allocated instances. The global pointers are then initialized to point to these instances.

Before this PR, here is what the output of the PlatformIO builder looks like:

RAM:   [======    ]  60.2% (used 1232 bytes from 2048 bytes)

Which looks reasonable. But after including the firmware's main objects in the statically allocated area as this PR does, here is the output:

RAM:   [========= ]  91.3% (used 1869 bytes from 2048 bytes)

Revealing that the memory actually available for the stack is much less than was suggested by the earlier output, causing issues like #190.

The memory saved here seems to fix #190 partially. At least, even with stack overflow detection enabled, the firmware can now survive reqInit and even knitting, from my quick test.

Note that this PR also deletes a series of uninitialized constant pointers that appear to have been remains from an earlier attempt at these global pointers.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Improved instance management for key components by replacing dynamic memory allocation with stack-allocated instances, enhancing performance and reducing memory leak risks.
  • Refactor
    • Streamlined the initialization process of singleton instances, resulting in clearer and more maintainable code.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Addressed potential memory management issues by eliminating the use of new for singleton instances.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 21, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent changes in src/ayab/main.cpp involve a significant refactor of singleton instance management. Instead of using constexpr pointers to dynamically allocated instances, the code now utilizes stack-allocated instances, enhancing memory management safety and performance by eliminating potential memory leaks and overhead from heap allocations.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/ayab/main.cpp Replaced constexpr pointers to singleton classes with direct stack-allocated instances.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Memory gets corrupted when processing serial messages (#190)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e960ad4 and 9b1c3a8.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/ayab/main.cpp (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/ayab/main.cpp (2)

39-45: LGTM! Improved memory management.

Replacing dynamic allocations with stack-allocated instances enhances memory management and performance.


47-53: LGTM! Correct initialization of static members.

The static members of the singleton classes are correctly initialized to point to stack instances.

Avoiding dynamic allocation saves some bookkeeping, but mainly
it lets Platform.IO output a more faithful evaluation of the RAM
requirements for the firmware.
@dl1com dl1com force-pushed the no-dynamic-alloc branch from 9b1c3a8 to a212fc6 Compare July 23, 2024 08:06
@dl1com dl1com merged commit 9c8648f into AllYarnsAreBeautiful:v1.0-dev Jul 23, 2024
2 checks passed
@jonathanperret jonathanperret deleted the no-dynamic-alloc branch July 23, 2024 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Memory gets corrupted when processing serial messages
3 participants