You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to thank you for your excellent work in this paper. I’ve been following your approach with great interest, and I have a question regarding the feature concatenation strategy mentioned in Section 4.6.
You explain that the original 2D features are concatenated with the fine-tuned features to preserve the generalization ability of the original 2D feature extractor while incorporating the 3D awareness of the fine-tuned features.
I’m curious about the impact on performance if, instead of concatenating the original 2D features, one were to use only the fine-tuned features directly (without any assembly strategy). Specifically, I would like to know how this would affect the performance on both within-domain and out-of-domain evaluation.
Any insights would be greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to thank you for your excellent work in this paper. I’ve been following your approach with great interest, and I have a question regarding the feature concatenation strategy mentioned in Section 4.6.
You explain that the original 2D features are concatenated with the fine-tuned features to preserve the generalization ability of the original 2D feature extractor while incorporating the 3D awareness of the fine-tuned features.
I’m curious about the impact on performance if, instead of concatenating the original 2D features, one were to use only the fine-tuned features directly (without any assembly strategy). Specifically, I would like to know how this would affect the performance on both within-domain and out-of-domain evaluation.
Any insights would be greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: