You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 26, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add the ability to specify resources inline with the operator-builder workload configuration. This obviously is not to encourage someone to type out an entire deployment in their workload config, rather it would be useful for something like a Namespace resource where one may need to be created, but it is not desirable to manage a separate file for that resource. That would change the spec for resources to:
We should also maintain backwards compatibility and assume that the absence of a file or inline key would default to it being a file. E.g. this would still be valid:
resources:
- path/to/legacy/resource.yaml
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add the ability to specify resources inline with the operator-builder workload configuration. This obviously is not to encourage someone to type out an entire deployment in their workload config, rather it would be useful for something like a
Namespace
resource where one may need to be created, but it is not desirable to manage a separate file for that resource. That would change the spec for resources to:We should also maintain backwards compatibility and assume that the absence of a
file
orinline
key would default to it being afile
. E.g. this would still be valid:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: