Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not enough IMU excitation, below threshold #4

Open
Wuxinxiaoshifu opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

Not enough IMU excitation, below threshold #4

Wuxinxiaoshifu opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@Wuxinxiaoshifu
Copy link

[InertialInitializer::initialize_with_imu] Not enough IMU excitation, below threshold 0.0241 < 0.2500
[ INFO] [1639578655.676617553]: Lidar scan no: 34
[ INFO] [1639578655.676645568]: No of lodom: 0
[ INFO] [1639578655.758270962]: No of imu measurements: 40
Failed to find match for field 'intensity'.
Failed to find match for field 'ring'.
Failed to find match for field 't'.
[InertialInitializer::initialize_with_imu] Not enough IMU excitation, below threshold 0.0476 < 0.2500
[ INFO] [1639578655.760411787]: Lidar scan no: 35
[ INFO] [1639578655.760441037]: No of lodom: 0
[ INFO] [1639578655.844012505]: No of imu measurements: 40
Failed to find match for field 'intensity'.
Failed to find match for field 'ring'.
Failed to find match for field 't'.
[InertialInitializer::initialize_with_imu] Initialization done!!!!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'pcl::IsNotDenseException'
what(): : Can't use 2D indexing with a unorganized point cloud
================================================================================REQUIRED process [ros_test_node-1] has died!

@SubMishMar
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like the issue is with the pointcloud, not with IMU readings.

@Wuxinxiaoshifu
Copy link
Author

i changed lidar's stamp to synchroize with imu's stamp,but it doesn't work;
can you tell me what is init_imu_thresh and init_window_time?
(/// If the above standard dev is below a threshold and we are waiting for a "jerk" then we want to wait till it is exceeded)

@zfc-zfc
Copy link

zfc-zfc commented Dec 23, 2021

i changed lidar's stamp to synchroize with imu's stamp,but it doesn't work; can you tell me what is init_imu_thresh and init_window_time? (/// If the above standard dev is below a threshold and we are waiting for a "jerk" then we want to wait till it is exceeded)

This is caused by unorganized pointcloud (the height is 1). You can modify the bag reader module to support unorganized pointcloud.

@Wuxinxiaoshifu
Copy link
Author

i changed lidar's stamp to synchroize with imu's stamp,but it doesn't work; can you tell me what is init_imu_thresh and init_window_time? (/// If the above standard dev is below a threshold and we are waiting for a "jerk" then we want to wait till it is exceeded)

This is caused by unorganized pointcloud (the height is 1). You can modify the bag reader module to support unorganized pointcloud.

thanks

@huanghqc
Copy link

huanghqc commented Jul 5, 2022

我更改了激光雷达的图章以与imu的图章同步,但它不起作用;你能告诉我什么是init_imu_thresh和init_window_time吗?(/// 如果上述标准 dev 低于阈值,并且我们正在等待“混蛋”,那么我们希望等到超过它)

这是由无组织的点云(高度为1)引起的。您可以修改袋子阅读器模块以支持无组织的点云。

谢谢

请问您是如何修改的,能否详细说明一下,多谢

@xzh313
Copy link

xzh313 commented Nov 15, 2022

我更改了激光雷达的图章以与imu的图章同步,但它不起作用;你能告诉我什么是init_imu_thresh和init_window_time吗?(/// 如果上述标准 dev 低于阈值,并且我们正在等待“混蛋”,那么我们希望等到超过它)

这是由无组织的点云(高度为1)引起的。您可以修改袋子阅读器模块以支持无组织的点云。

谢谢

请问您是如何修改的,能否详细说明一下,多谢

请问最后解决了吗? @huanghqc

@HyeonnSeo
Copy link

i changed lidar's stamp to synchroize with imu's stamp,but it doesn't work; can you tell me what is init_imu_thresh and init_window_time? (/// If the above standard dev is below a threshold and we are waiting for a "jerk" then we want to wait till it is exceeded)

This is caused by unorganized pointcloud (the height is 1). You can modify the bag reader module to support unorganized pointcloud.

what it means? @zfc-zfc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants