You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The degree of establishment for a species is already mapped to the Blackburn et al. 2011 vocabulary. This is an example of the content:
degree_of_establishment
records
B2
5
B3
1
C0
6
C0 - C3
1
C1 - C3
1
C3
1
C3, D1, D2
1
D2, E
1
E
12
A few species are categorized under more then one category. My first reaction was to map each catogory per species as a separate row, but this might give a wrong impression when interpreting the data. I think that, by including different categories, the author means that we are not certain about the exact degree of establishment. Therefore I think we should map the categories together:
If a taxon is mapped to a range or multiple Blackburn degree_of_establishment values, how should that be expressed in Darwin Core: have one row for each degree_of_establishment listed?
If within a time period and area there are both temporary and established populations, then I think we would default to the most established of Blackburn's categories.
I agree, the framework is more or less hierarchical in the sense that a species "achieves" a certain degree of establishment and that is also what is relevant for policy and management
The degree of establishment for a species is already mapped to the Blackburn et al. 2011 vocabulary. This is an example of the content:
A few species are categorized under more then one category. My first reaction was to map each catogory per species as a separate row, but this might give a wrong impression when interpreting the data. I think that, by including different categories, the author means that we are not certain about the exact degree of establishment. Therefore I think we should map the categories together:
@peterdesmet?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: