You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The wavelength solution implementation is not flexible enough (at least in my opinion). So, maybe I should start talking about implementations. My idea is to keep the current way of writing the raw wavelength solution in the custom method developed for the pipeline, the iraf-compatible method and add an option to let specutils take care of the solution handling process.
It should not be the default option to not disrupt current operations but I believe at some point it should be the default.
The custom implementation is OK because the code for writing and reading are provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The wavelength solution implementation is not flexible enough (at least in my opinion). So, maybe I should start talking about implementations. My idea is to keep the current way of writing the raw wavelength solution in the custom method developed for the pipeline, the iraf-compatible method and add an option to let specutils take care of the solution handling process.
It should not be the default option to not disrupt current operations but I believe at some point it should be the default.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: