-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an alloc feature #308
Comments
I would be ok reorganizing things, but I would prefer that the decision that the libs team wants to solve rust-lang/rust#48331 be made first before the effort to reorganize things is put in. |
That seems reasonable. Is there something that needs to be done to get that on the libs team agenda? The discussion on that other issue seems to have stalled. |
Note that this won't really solve the issue since |
I'm going to close this because I don't think this needs to be done at this time, and integration into libstd is a very tricky problem beyond simply shuffling imports. |
If there was an alloc feature in addition to the std feature then parts of the library that need allocation but not the rest of the standard library could still be used in a no_std context.
This would unblock rust-lang/rust#62502, which in turn would unblock rust-lang/rust#48331.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: