You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi
When Cohen d =0, there is an explanation like that: "Moreover, in order to have one more favourable outcome in the "treatment" group compared to the "control" group, we need to treat 16.5 people on average. " it is seen as NNT= 16.5 on the graph. Then again, we calculate the number of people in the experimental group, ex. 20+6.1. This is confusing, at least mine :).
Is 16.5 a raw number or a percentage, because the numbers you use in the whole process are percentages, not raw points.
Thank you
Hi
When Cohen d =0, there is an explanation like that: "Moreover, in order to have one more favourable outcome in the "treatment" group compared to the "control" group, we need to treat 16.5 people on average. " it is seen as NNT= 16.5 on the graph. Then again, we calculate the number of people in the experimental group, ex. 20+6.1. This is confusing, at least mine :).
Is 16.5 a raw number or a percentage, because the numbers you use in the whole process are percentages, not raw points.
Thank you
ARR=(Control event rate)− (Experimental event rate)
ARR=0.2−0.3651=−0.1651
NNT=1/ARR
NNT=1/−0.1651=−6.1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: