Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drop min_confidence #162

Open
dpprdan opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

drop min_confidence #162

dpprdan opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@dpprdan
Copy link
Member

dpprdan commented Dec 22, 2024

OpenCage (the API) has dropped support for min_confidence (the parameter kind of still works, but not always reliably, e.g. #161).

I am leaning towards removing all code w.r.t. min_confidence and to just issue a warning that the parameter is not supported anymore. There is not much use passing it through to the API if the results aren't reliable. Also it apparently hasn't been used much in practice and was often misunderstood anyways.

@maelle
Copy link
Member

maelle commented Jan 7, 2025

Using https://lifecycle.r-lib.org/articles/communicate.html#arguments?

dpprdan added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2025
* use examples from Brest instead of Nantes, because some examples don't work anymore, cf. #160

* remove tests w.r.t. `min_confidence`, cf. #161, #162

* update {Roxygen} version

* add ProjectId

* update snapshots, presumably due to changes in {testthat}

* make lintr happy

* remove more tests w.r.t. `min_confidence`

* some minor fixes, e.g. `q=Berlin, limit=5` returns only one result, making that example useless. also the hotel de ville in Nantes example isn't working anymore, see #160

* pre-compile vignettes and README
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants