Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change attribute for policy requirements in DFG checklist catalog #275

Closed
jwindeck opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #276
Closed

change attribute for policy requirements in DFG checklist catalog #275

jwindeck opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #276

Comments

@jwindeck
Copy link
Collaborator

jwindeck commented Aug 22, 2024

We are currently revising the NFDI4ING catalog which is based on the DFG checklist catalog.

For the question "Are there any significant research codes or professional standards to be taken into account?" the catalog uses the attribute https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/yesno, but it expects options as answers, so it's not really a yes-no question.

I found that in the RDMO catalog, two questions are connected:

"Are there requirements regarding the data management from other parties (e.g. the scholarly/scientific community)?" pointing to https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/yesno

and

"Which are these additional requirements regarding data management?" pointing to https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/requirements

The second question seems expecting an answer closer to the DFG checklist question.

So I suggest, to change the attribute to https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/requirements in the DFG checklist catalog.

An alternative might be, since "additional_rdm_policy" is not quite the right wording, to introduce a new attribute like https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/rdm_policies, but this should then be changed in other catalogs as well to ensure interoperability.

see

<question dc:uri="https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/questions/DFG-Checkliste/rights/scientific_specifics/scientific_standards">

@Zack-83
Copy link
Member

Zack-83 commented Sep 3, 2024

Good idea. First attempt: 3310b22 Please review it, @jwindeck

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants