You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are currently revising the NFDI4ING catalog which is based on the DFG checklist catalog.
For the question "Are there any significant research codes or professional standards to be taken into account?" the catalog uses the attribute https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/yesno, but it expects options as answers, so it's not really a yes-no question.
I found that in the RDMO catalog, two questions are connected:
"Are there requirements regarding the data management from other parties (e.g. the scholarly/scientific community)?" pointing to https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/yesno
and
"Which are these additional requirements regarding data management?" pointing to https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/requirements
The second question seems expecting an answer closer to the DFG checklist question.
So I suggest, to change the attribute to https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/requirements in the DFG checklist catalog.
An alternative might be, since "additional_rdm_policy" is not quite the right wording, to introduce a new attribute like https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/rdm_policies, but this should then be changed in other catalogs as well to ensure interoperability.
We are currently revising the NFDI4ING catalog which is based on the DFG checklist catalog.
For the question "Are there any significant research codes or professional standards to be taken into account?" the catalog uses the attribute
https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/yesno
, but it expects options as answers, so it's not really a yes-no question.I found that in the RDMO catalog, two questions are connected:
"Are there requirements regarding the data management from other parties (e.g. the scholarly/scientific community)?" pointing to
https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/yesno
and
"Which are these additional requirements regarding data management?" pointing to
https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/requirements
The second question seems expecting an answer closer to the DFG checklist question.
So I suggest, to change the attribute to
https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/additional_rdm_policy/requirements
in the DFG checklist catalog.An alternative might be, since "additional_rdm_policy" is not quite the right wording, to introduce a new attribute like
https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/rdm_policies
, but this should then be changed in other catalogs as well to ensure interoperability.see
rdmo-catalog/rdmorganiser/questions/questions-DFG-Checkliste.xml
Line 857 in 6a0ad9c
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: