You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In order to make the repository lighter it would be better to move the IDA SDKs out of the repository.
The SDKs are encrypted and used only for tests in the github CI, so they are not useful to the users.
Possible solutions are:
Using git LFS
using another repository
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Indeed, the SDK are encrypted and thus not really useful to anyone else beside the CI.
However, I'm worried that the Git LFS limits are going to be reached easily. But maybe caching the download would prevent the bandwidth quota to explode.
I think the best solution would be to create a private quarkslab owned github repository. It integrates very well with github checkout action and we can avoid having to encrypt the files.
Also I think in this case it's worth manually removing those files from the git commit history and push forcing again.
Those files represents something like 99% of the size of the entire repository and it's making a standard git clone very slow.
In order to make the repository lighter it would be better to move the IDA SDKs out of the repository.
The SDKs are encrypted and used only for tests in the github CI, so they are not useful to the users.
Possible solutions are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: