documentation

[eriknw]

CyToolz needs at least some documentation. Should this be part of the documentation for Toolz, or separate?

Don't forget to have an "Advanced Usage" section that shows how to use the C API of CyToolz (see #5).

[mrocklin]

We should definitely include a page in the toolz docs. Most (all?) of the
toolz docs also apply to cytoolz.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Erik Welch [email protected] wrote:

CyToolz needs at least some documentation. Should this be part of the
documentation for Toolz, or separate?

Don't forget to have an "Advanced Usage" section that shows how to use the
C API of CyToolz (see #5 #5).

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/8
.

[eriknw]

Yeah, I'd say all of the toolz docs also apply to cytoolz, and a page for cytoolz in the toolz docs would be sufficient. Aside from this, a better README.rst is needed for cytoolz too.