You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are several good notes on this in the PR (e.g. here).
My concern is that changing the return type from list to string will likely surprise someone somewhere in the future. On the other hand, we also don't want to make it look as if the query just didn't return any results. So I want to open this issue in order to think about this again and maybe find a different implementation that achieves both goals
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We want to keep our issues up to date and active. This issue hasn't seen any activity in the last 75 days.
We have applied the _flag:stale label to indicate that this issue should be reviewed again.
When you review, please reread the spec and then apply one of these three options:
prioritize: apply the flag:schedule label to suggest moving this issue into the backlog now
close: if the issue is no longer relevant, explain why (give others a chance to reply) and then close.
archive: sometimes an issue has important information or ideas but we won't work on it soon. In this case
apply the someday label to show that this won't be prioritized. The stalebot will ignore issues with this
label in the future. Use sparingly!
surchs
added
flag:schedule
Flag issue that should go on the roadmap or backlog.
and removed
_flag:stale
[BOT ONLY] Flag issue that hasn't been updated in a while and needs to be triaged again
labels
Jan 30, 2024
In #214 the
subject_data
argument return type was changed for the aggregated API mode fromlist
tostr
like so:Expected
subject_data
format in:subject_data = "protected"
There are several good notes on this in the PR (e.g. here).
My concern is that changing the return type from list to string will likely surprise someone somewhere in the future. On the other hand, we also don't want to make it look as if the query just didn't return any results. So I want to open this issue in order to think about this again and maybe find a different implementation that achieves both goals
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: