You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We switched to maximal footprints in order to pick up places like the southwest corner near Santa Cruz. With the switch to bounding box filling, covering empty pixels now produces transparencies in the resulting output. Switching back to minimal footprints (and buffering the bounding box) should eliminate the voids and pick up places that would have been missed previously.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also look into rio's --with-nodata option (in addition to / conditionally instead of --mask); with bbox filling, unmasked water areas need to be seen as uncovered to pick resolution to use behind them.
mojodna
added a commit
to mojodna/marblecutter-tilezen
that referenced
this issue
Dec 19, 2017
We switched to maximal footprints in order to pick up places like the southwest corner near Santa Cruz. With the switch to bounding box filling, covering empty pixels now produces transparencies in the resulting output. Switching back to minimal footprints (and buffering the bounding box) should eliminate the voids and pick up places that would have been missed previously.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: