You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment, there really isn't an easy way of looking at the contents of mixture distributions. I am trying to determine if all the elements in a mixture are normal to see if I can just use conjugacy to calculate the posterior. But, family() just returns the that it is a mixture. So it would be good if there was maybe an additional parameter or something that you could add to family() to look at the distributions making up the mixture.
This seems a bit tricky to design, but a similar problem would apply to other distribution modifiers - dist_inflated(), dist_truncated(), and dist_transformed().
I'm using {distributional} as a dependency in the {epiparameter} package and would also find the get_base_families() a super helpful function to be included in {distributional}.
At the moment, there really isn't an easy way of looking at the contents of mixture distributions. I am trying to determine if all the elements in a mixture are normal to see if I can just use conjugacy to calculate the posterior. But,
family()
just returns the that it is a mixture. So it would be good if there was maybe an additional parameter or something that you could add tofamily()
to look at the distributions making up the mixture.Brief description of the problem
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: