You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks so much for this project. I was about to design a PCB for this chip, but you've done all the work! I'm about to order some PCBs and build this with an SE050E, rather than the 050C called for in the BOM. Is there anything I should know not documented in the repo (lessons learned over the past 14 months), or any reason to believe the SE050E would not work?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As far as I can see, replacing se050c by se050e should work seamlessly.
Obviously you will have to use the new software stack from nxp.
Le sam. 2 avr. 2022, 18:41, Michael Andersen ***@***.***> a
écrit :
Thanks so much for this project. I was about to design a PCB for this
chip, but you've done all the work! I'm about to order some PCBs and build
this with an SE050E, rather than the 050C called for in the BOM. Is there
anything I should know not documented in the repo (lessons learned over the
past 14 months), or any reason to believe the SE050E would not work?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALN3RNCRSE4VGBWIAC5VTBTVDB2FFANCNFSM5SLE4KKQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
Thanks so much for this project. I was about to design a PCB for this chip, but you've done all the work! I'm about to order some PCBs and build this with an SE050E, rather than the 050C called for in the BOM. Is there anything I should know not documented in the repo (lessons learned over the past 14 months), or any reason to believe the SE050E would not work?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: