-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Standard RB? #110
Comments
The short answer to your question: I'm aware of That said, as the OP of #47 suggested, I can imagine nextgen evolving at some point to ask more targeted questions instead of showing a single giant list of optional generators. I also recognize that RuboCop is a particularly confusing/contentious aspect of Rails these days, and nextgen could help provide some clarity. Perhaps a new question like this:
|
Totally understand. Is it something you'd accept a minimal PR for, or something you're feeling a little tighter around right now? |
If the PR is pretty small, yes, I think this month would be a good time to fold it in. An easy way to do it might be to add a Standard generator to Nextgen's generators.yml with the constraint Then, the Standard generator will need to:
|
First of all, big fan of this library. I've used it a few times now and it's just the best. Thank you so much for your continued work on it and attention to detail, Matt!
Just had one thought / question around linting / formatting. I love that nextgen comes with Rubocop linting but I tend to use Standard RB on more projects nowadays. Curious if that's in the future gamut for you here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: