Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9937c82 and 4a9a2e6.

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

• components/UI/desktopNav.tsx (3 hunks)
• components/UI/iconsComponents/icons/discordIcon.tsx (1 hunks)
• components/UI/iconsComponents/icons/githubIcon.tsx (1 hunks)
• components/UI/iconsComponents/icons/twitterIcon.tsx (1 hunks)
• components/UI/searchBar.tsx (1 hunks)
• package.json (2 hunks)
• styles/components/desktopNav.module.css (2 hunks)

components/UI/searchBar.tsx (1)

140-140: LGTM! Good defensive programming practice.

The addition of optional chaining for document access is a good practice for SSR compatibility and runtime safety.

components/UI/desktopNav.tsx (1)

25-28: Consider fallback for document undefined.

The optional chaining might hide real issues. Consider adding a development-time warning when document is undefined.

+    if (typeof document === "undefined") {
+      console.warn("DesktopNav: document is undefined, event listeners won't work");
+      return;
+    }
-    document?.addEventListener("mousedown", handleClickOutside);
+    document.addEventListener("mousedown", handleClickOutside);
     return () => {
-      document?.removeEventListener("mousedown", handleClickOutside);
+      document.removeEventListener("mousedown", handleClickOutside);
     };

✅ Verification successful

Add development-time warning for document undefined

The review comment is valid. Since this is a Next.js application with SSR capabilities, adding the development-time warning is a good practice. The suggested code changes will help catch potential SSR-related issues during development while ensuring proper cleanup of event listeners.

The proposed solution:

1. Early check for document undefined with a warning
2. Safe access to document APIs after the check
3. Proper cleanup in the effect's cleanup function

The suggested code changes in the review comment are appropriate and should be implemented as shown.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the component is used in SSR context
rg -l "getServerSideProps|getInitialProps" . | grep -v "node_modules"

Length of output: 69

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if it's a Next.js project and look for SSR indicators
echo "=== Checking for Next.js configuration ==="
fd "next.config" --type f

echo -e "\n=== Checking for pages directory (Next.js SSR) ==="
fd "^pages$" --type d

echo -e "\n=== Examining document usage patterns ==="
rg "document\?" -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== Looking at the full component context ==="
cat components/UI/desktopNav.tsx

Length of output: 5378

styles/components/desktopNav.module.css (2)

46-46: LGTM: Color variable update aligns with design system.

The hover state color has been updated to use the design system variable.

---

9-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove duplicate box-shadow property.

The box-shadow property is declared twice with the same value.

  box-shadow: 0px 2px 30px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.06);
  border: 1px solid var(--Colors-Content-Grey-200, rgba(205, 204, 204, 1));
  /* border: 1px solid var(--light-tertiary-300, #cccccc); */
  /* background: var(--background-light, #fffcf8); */
  /* Small Shadow */
- box-shadow: 0px 2px 30px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.06);

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

package.json (2)

13-13: LGTM: Minor version updates for dependencies.

The updates to @anima-protocol/personhood-sdk-react and @emotion/react are minor version bumps that should maintain backward compatibility.

Also applies to: 15-15

---

34-34: Verify Next.js v15 upgrade impact.

The upgrade from Next.js 14 to 15 is a major version change that might introduce breaking changes. Please ensure:

1. All Next.js features used in the codebase are compatible with v15
2. The application has been thoroughly tested with the new version
3. The upgrade follows the official migration guide

Run this script to check for potential breaking changes:

Also applies to: 40-40

✅ Verification successful

Next.js v15 upgrade appears safe to proceed

The codebase uses the Pages Router pattern which maintains backward compatibility in Next.js 15. No high-risk patterns or deprecated features were detected in the current implementation.

• Verify Node.js version meets Next.js 15 requirements (Node.js 18.17 or later)
• Test Image Component usage if present

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Next.js specific patterns that might be affected by v15 upgrade

# Search for Next.js imports and usage
echo "Checking Next.js imports and usage patterns..."
rg "from 'next/" -A 2

# Search for potential breaking patterns (examples from Next.js changelog)
echo "Checking for potentially affected patterns..."
rg "getInitialProps|getServerSideProps|getStaticProps|getStaticPaths"

Length of output: 302

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify repository content and Next.js usage

# Check if repository is properly cloned
echo "Checking repository content..."
ls -la

# Look for Next.js configuration and structure
echo -e "\nChecking Next.js files and structure..."
fd -t f "^next\.config\.(js|mjs|ts)$"
fd -t d "^(app|pages)$"

# Broader search for Next.js patterns
echo -e "\nChecking Next.js imports and usage (broader patterns)..."
rg "from ['\"]next" -l
rg "import.*from ['\"]next" -l

# Check for routing and API patterns
echo -e "\nChecking routing and API patterns..."
fd -t f "^route\.(js|ts)$"
fd -t f "^page\.(js|tsx|ts)$"
fd -t f "^layout\.(js|tsx|ts)$"

Length of output: 5708