You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was using PPanGGOLiN to build pangenome. I'm wondering is there any parameter related to 'protein family sequence identity threshold' I could tune, or what's the default setting for it? Compared with other pangenome tools, PPanGGOLiN gives me a higher number of gene families. So I am thinking maybe it is caused by the higher 'family threshold' setting in PPanGGOLiN?
Looking forward to your reply!
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your kind words and for using PPanGGOLiN!
Yes, there are parameters you can adjust related to the protein family clustering threshold. In both the ppanggolin all command and the ppanggolin cluster command (if you're running a step-by-step analysis), you’ll find these options:
--coverage COVERAGE Minimal coverage of the alignment for two proteins to be in the same cluster. Default: 0.8
--identity IDENTITY Minimal identity percentage for two proteins to be in the same cluster. Default: 0.8
By default, both the identity and coverage thresholds are set to 0.8, meaning 80% identity and 80% coverage. These values control the clustering process, which is performed using MMseqs2.
The higher number of families may simply be due to differences in clustering strategies between the tools. By the way, which tool did you compare PPanGGOLiN with? Perhaps @ggautreau has additional insight on this topic.
Hi!
Thank you for developing this efficient tool!
I was using PPanGGOLiN to build pangenome. I'm wondering is there any parameter related to 'protein family sequence identity threshold' I could tune, or what's the default setting for it? Compared with other pangenome tools, PPanGGOLiN gives me a higher number of gene families. So I am thinking maybe it is caused by the higher 'family threshold' setting in PPanGGOLiN?
Looking forward to your reply!
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: