You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes, we have the need to push minor changes to the main branch from a working level branch (for e.g., typo or error fixes in the public docs page). However, in this case, the main branch goes out of sync with the dev branch over time, making more tedious when we want to publish docs for new releases (which requires a merge in the opposite direction, dev --> main).
To help with this, @mewim proposed a CI that does the following:
If the merge PR originated from any branch other than dev, and the destination branch is main, an action would trigger a second PR from main to dev to reflect the changes on the dev branch as well.
This would help us keep important changes that directly get deployed on main on dev as well, reduce scope for discrepancies, and improve the productivity of the team.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Workflow improvement
Sometimes, we have the need to push minor changes to the
main
branch from a working level branch (for e.g., typo or error fixes in the public docs page). However, in this case, themain
branch goes out of sync with thedev
branch over time, making more tedious when we want to publish docs for new releases (which requires a merge in the opposite direction,dev
-->main
).To help with this, @mewim proposed a CI that does the following:
dev
, and the destination branch ismain
, an action would trigger a second PR frommain
todev
to reflect the changes on thedev
branch as well.This would help us keep important changes that directly get deployed on
main
ondev
as well, reduce scope for discrepancies, and improve the productivity of the team.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: