Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SCImago Journal #68

Open
DominiqueMakowski opened this issue Sep 23, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

SCImago Journal #68

DominiqueMakowski opened this issue Sep 23, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Contributor

Just discovered this nice package for extracting the SJR index of journals' prestige. It could potentially be a nice addition to the impact_factor related functions.

Specifically, as it includes the SJR index for different years, it would provide a unique opportunity to compute this index for each author's publication at their time of publication. Could be interesting for developing new authors' impact metrics.

@rudazhang
Copy link

Associating publications with journal impact factors is a nice feature to have, but a more immediate issue I think is to uniquely identify the journals, which Google Scholar does not do.

@xraynaud
Copy link

xraynaud commented Jul 22, 2019

The sjr data available in the package seems outdated. Updated data is available here: https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?out=xls

Below is a modified version of get_journalrank() to download an updated version. (Please note that I'm using readr::read_csv2 due to problems with decimal separators in the scimago table and that readr has some parsing errors, that are due to missing quotes in the scimago data table).

get_journalrank <- function (journals, max.distance = 0.05) {
  readr::read_csv2("https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?out=xls")-> myjournalrankings
  scholar:::get_journal_stats(journals, max.distance, myjournalrankings, col= "Title")
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants