Why I use automatic_scaling, Convergence is worse? #29176
Unanswered
wangzhaohao
asked this question in
Q&A General
Replies: 2 comments 18 replies
-
hello you can try
to get around a zero-pivot in LU This is fairly loose
so you might want to tighten it or be mindful if it causes trouble later on Guillaume |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
18 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Check these boxes if you have followed the posting rules.
Question
Hello, MOOSE developers.
$$\rho C \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} - \nabla \cdot (k \nabla T) - q = 0$$
$$\frac{\partial p}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot [(1 - p) p \vec{v} - \nu \nabla p] = 0$$
$$0 = \rho \cdot \Delta$$
I am going to use SUPG Method in a diffusion-advection problem. when I code this, follwing is the PDE.
So my Input file is
If I don't use the
automatic_scaling = true scaling_group_variables = 'disp_x; temp; porosity'
, the residual in the last step is like thisbut when i used
I also try to use
analyzejacobian
to check the Jacobian.So how to fix this problem, thanks for you help in advance.
Zhaohao Wang.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions