You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Class-based SmallLint tests (and potentially other tests, but their behavior has not been examined yet) seem to be executed exactly as often per class as the amount of methods in the class dictates. That also means a test ist never executed if there are no methods in a class.
This suggests that the current implementation just delegates calls arriving at checkMethod to checkClass, which would yield exactly this behavior.
Obviously, this cannot be intended and should thus be fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Class-based SmallLint tests (and potentially other tests, but their behavior has not been examined yet) seem to be executed exactly as often per class as the amount of methods in the class dictates. That also means a test ist never executed if there are no methods in a class.
This suggests that the current implementation just delegates calls arriving at
checkMethod
tocheckClass
, which would yield exactly this behavior.Obviously, this cannot be intended and should thus be fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: