Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't strictly depend on quicklisp by hardcoding quicklisp API code at the top of the file #29

Open
jgarte opened this issue Dec 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Don't strictly depend on quicklisp by hardcoding quicklisp API code at the top of the file #29

jgarte opened this issue Dec 3, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@jgarte
Copy link
Contributor

jgarte commented Dec 3, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Hi,

Thanks for making this project!

I think we should not make sbcli strictly depend on quicklisp by hardcoding quicklisp specific code at the top of the file.

There are other package managers for Common Lisp such as Nix, Guix, Roswell, etc. that require the project to be in a package manager agnostic format.
@jgarte jgarte changed the title Don't strictly depend on quicklisp by hardcoding quicklisp code at the top of the file Don't strictly depend on quicklisp by hardcoding quicklisp API code at the top of the file Dec 3, 2022
This was referenced Dec 3, 2022
Open
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jgarte