You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This could be a single component with an externally switched bypass path, similar to the design in HackRF One, at least for the initial implementation.
We'll likely want to test candidate components to measure performance on our stack-up over our wide range of operating frequencies.
We will want to be able to guarantee the capability of achieving a certain output power, perhaps 0 dBm, across the whole frequency range.
We might consider two or more separate amplifiers for different frequency ranges. Another option might be a single wideband amplifier plus a secondary (chained) amplifier used only for high frequencies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See mainboard block diagram: https://github.com/greatscottgadgets/lab-notes/tree/main/project-reports/2023-06-02-urti-progress-report#mainboard-block-diagram
This could be a single component with an externally switched bypass path, similar to the design in HackRF One, at least for the initial implementation.
We'll likely want to test candidate components to measure performance on our stack-up over our wide range of operating frequencies.
We will want to be able to guarantee the capability of achieving a certain output power, perhaps 0 dBm, across the whole frequency range.
We might consider two or more separate amplifiers for different frequency ranges. Another option might be a single wideband amplifier plus a secondary (chained) amplifier used only for high frequencies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: