Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Loading ply from trained_chunks folder in SIBR_gaussianViewer_app viewer shows different result #47

Closed
anchun opened this issue Aug 9, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@anchun
Copy link

anchun commented Aug 9, 2024

Thank you for your great work for hierarchical 3DGS!
After training with wayve dataset, the result shows great as follows:
h3dgs-good

When I look into the traing_chunk in details, it shows there are some intermidiate point_cloud result in output/trained_chunks/0_0. when I tried to load it in original 3DGS viewer, but it shows some artifacts(e.g. some white lines near the wheel).
sibr_3dgs
The loading command is: SIBR_gaussianViewer_app -m ./output/trained_chunks/0_0. it seems the opacity is not translated well in the original 3DGS viewer.
So My question is: what's the main difference between the original ply format and the new ply format in hierarchical-3d-gaussians? Thanks!

@Snosixtyboo
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

thanks for trying! Yes, there is a key difference: the new viewer uses correct antialiasing. This is something that will be backported to the original 3DGS viewer soon as well, so you should be able to view them correctly.

Hth!
Bernhard

@anchun
Copy link
Author

anchun commented Aug 16, 2024

Hi,

thanks for trying! Yes, there is a key difference: the new viewer uses correct antialiasing. This is something that will be backported to the original 3DGS viewer soon as well, so you should be able to view them correctly.

Hth! Bernhard

Thank you, Bernhard! it's related to DGR_FIX_AA settings in the code.

Anchun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants