Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate possibility of using Vite / Bun instead of Webpack for local plugin development #3653

Open
Tracked by #3733
brojd opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #3733

Investigate possibility of using Vite / Bun instead of Webpack for local plugin development #3653

brojd opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
involved:Frontend needs triage

Comments

@brojd
Copy link
Contributor

brojd commented Jan 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The purpose is to check if we can use Vite or Bun instead of Webpack for plugin development so that it works faster (on local + on CI) and is easier to configure/maintain.

Also worth to check how using local Grafana would work for us

Parent issue: #3650
@brojd brojd changed the title Investigate possibility of using Vite instead of Webpack for local plugin development Investigate possibility of using Vite / Bun instead of Webpack for local plugin development Jan 10, 2024
@brojd brojd mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2024
Open
@brojd brojd mentioned this issue Jan 23, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
involved:Frontend needs triage
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@iskhakov @brojd