You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After sending a reply with <Ctrl>-<Enter>, the reply box loses focus.
Steps to Reproduce
Type a reply.
Press <Ctrl>-<Enter> to send.
Expected Behavior
The reply box regains focus (i.e., for a subsequent reply).
Actual Behavior
The reply box loses focus.
Comments
The chat UX idiom encourages people to (think they can) send multiple short messages in rapid succession, which is clumsy if the reply box can be submitted with the keyboard but must regain focus via the mouse.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Originally I think this was introduced to avoid the replybox losing focus if a user was using the replybox while a background sync was applied. But a side-effect is the behaviour you mention (the replybox requires mouseclick or inconvenient tab/keyboard navigation in order to be refocused).
I think it's a fair point - it's inconvenient to get back to the replybox without using the cursor. I would say we should keep this open but not treat it as a release blocker - it's not a regression but we should put more time into all of our accessibility/navigation behaviours and making them consistent/predictable. That work for you @cfm ?
Description
After sending a reply with <Ctrl>-<Enter>, the reply box loses focus.
Steps to Reproduce
Expected Behavior
The reply box regains focus (i.e., for a subsequent reply).
Actual Behavior
The reply box loses focus.
Comments
The chat UX idiom encourages people to (think they can) send multiple short messages in rapid succession, which is clumsy if the reply box can be submitted with the keyboard but must regain focus via the mouse.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: