Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Limits are too conservative on FCI #90

Open
prakharg01 opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Limits are too conservative on FCI #90

prakharg01 opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@prakharg01
Copy link

prakharg01 commented Dec 24, 2024

Hi, while running the franka_ros2 wrapper built on top of libfranka, we notice that the limits set are too conservative for operation. The arms gets into joint velocity violation very often, but the workspace seems to be safe.

  • Is there a way to override FCI limits(positions or velocity). Can we modify through watchman to make the arm move faster or close to limits. We are working on realtime teleoperation and the arm keeps getting the same joint velocity violation when we are using external joint impedance controller.

  • The Cartesian and joint position controllers written as examples in franka_ros2 don't seem to even start working on h/w, as soon as the controllers are activated the arm gives the violation. We also notice that the ROS2 system plugin uses active_control rather than robot.control. Running the example using libfranka examples works but same one fails or gives violation when using Ros2

  • We need to make the safety a little less conservative and don't seem to find a way for that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant