-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Roadmap #6
Comments
@remmeier thanks for this. I agree with you, both a roadmap and a comparison matrix are in order. Regarding your list of items:
I've spent some time in the past thinking about an API for this but then I had to lower the priority. But I agree with you that it should be part of yacl4j. I'll open a task for this to make sure it gets tracked.
I guess all extensions will be added on a per-request basis. I've noticed that the Consul one is pretty popular and I don't think it will be hard to implement.
Sounds interesting! I'm not aware of this new API, could you please provide a link?
Are you referring to Java 8 default methods for providing default values of configuration defined through interfaces? If that's the case, see this Jackson issue for an update on the subject.
As with the reloading API, also this one is on my "mental" roadmap by quite some time. I didn't look specifically at Archaius before but I did look at Spring Boot's profiles and Cfg4j's environments as good examples. But I'll open a task for this too. |
Regarding JEE8, seems that I was mistaken. It was planned but did not make it. It is however in the competing/complementing/... MicroProfile standard. e.g. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/was_beta_liberty/com.ibm.websphere.wlp.nd.multiplatform.doc/ae/cwlp_microprofile_overview.html. resp. https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-config I do have an implementation for cascading for cfg4j, that could be ported if it is a match. Archius seems quite a bit more advanced compared to Spring Boot. Altough the implementation is a bit of a mess with that v1/v2 version. cfg4j is fairly broken in this area. Consul could be ported from cfg4j as it makes use of the same license. |
It looks interesting, even though there are a couple of API design choices I don't particularly agree with. Ultimately, I think an extension supporting this API is feasible.
Is it public? I could have a look to have a better idea.
I agree, it seems the easiest way to go. |
As an extension would be great. I guess would also give a bit of traction by support a standard (if one considers micro-profile being a standard). No, not public so far. But it looks like:
and
Setup can obviously be simplified, mainly limited by cfg4j. An environment may include zone, region, name, component and allow config file with a permutation thereof. |
a roadmap resp. pending features would be great. Some things that do come into my mind:
and to some degree it would be good to compare this feature set to other configurations out there (to be sure this one is the one worthwhile to use...)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: