You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to include results for stronger systems in a pull request (e.g. equivalences to Pi^1_1-CA_0).
RT appears to be the strongest system currently here (according to this output of rmzoo), and RT is itself below ATR in strength (Patey, "The reverse mathematics of Ramsey-type theorems", p.28), so it appears that all theories here currently are below ATR. Is there a guideline against adding theories stronger than RT or ATR to rmzoo (e.g. if the focus is on the detail of the hierarchy around RCA through ACA), or is it allowed?
It's been a while since this repository has been very active... but I have no objection to extending up to stronger systems!
My interest was originally focused more on results below ATR, but that was just a personal focus, along with the fact that I never got the time to transcribe very much of SOSOA... which seemed pretty important before adding many stronger theorems.
I would like to include results for stronger systems in a pull request (e.g. equivalences to Pi^1_1-CA_0).
RT appears to be the strongest system currently here (according to this output of rmzoo), and RT is itself below ATR in strength (Patey, "The reverse mathematics of Ramsey-type theorems", p.28), so it appears that all theories here currently are below ATR. Is there a guideline against adding theories stronger than RT or ATR to rmzoo (e.g. if the focus is on the detail of the hierarchy around RCA through ACA), or is it allowed?
The Contributing guidelines page contains the following quote:
If there is a guideline against adding theories stronger than RT, should the results from SOSOA be cut off to only include theories weaker than ATR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: