Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Perf] Windows/arm64: 1 Regression on 12/19/2024 9:15:10 PM +00:00 #111252

Open
performanceautofiler bot opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
arch-arm64 area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI os-windows runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime
Milestone

Comments

@performanceautofiler
Copy link

Run Information

Name Value
Architecture arm64
OS Windows 10.0.22621
Queue SurfaceWindows
Baseline 144dcae3497f73366ec7d076e6e7ea4ff856ce7d
Compare cf4d2b0594a7af4a5ff39ffd4fe5cfb0c5577a3d
Diff Diff
Configs CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:micro

Regressions in System.Net.Primitives.Tests.IPAddressPerformanceTests

Benchmark Baseline Test Test/Base Test Quality Edge Detector Baseline IR Compare IR IR Ratio
3.68 ns 5.45 ns 1.48 0.04 True

graph
Test Report

Repro

General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md

git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'System.Net.Primitives.Tests.IPAddressPerformanceTests*'

System.Net.Primitives.Tests.IPAddressPerformanceTests.TryWriteBytes(address: 143.24.20.36)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

Docs

Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository

@performanceautofiler performanceautofiler bot added arch-arm64 os-windows PGO runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Jan 9, 2025
@LoopedBard3 LoopedBard3 added untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner and removed PGO untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Jan 9, 2025
@LoopedBard3 LoopedBard3 transferred this issue from dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues Jan 9, 2025
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jan 9, 2025
@LoopedBard3
Copy link
Member

Compare Range: 237c759...208b974. Potential cause of: #110824, FYI @EgorBo.

Looking at the ADX, it seems to be impacting multiple Linux configurations as well but I am not finding any autofile issues for them at the moment.

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jan 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@vcsjones vcsjones removed the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jan 12, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jan 14, 2025
@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arch-arm64 area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI os-windows runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants