Skip to content

Update ethr DID using a web3 provider (such as Metamask) #692

Answered by mirceanis
jrhender asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Yes, that is correct.
However, you might run into other issues if you replace the whole keyManager plugin.
Instead it would be better to create an implementation of an AbstractKeyManagementSystem(KMS) (take a look at @veramo/kms-local) that wraps the signing capability of a web3 provider.

We have some plans to create a KMS that does exactly that, but haven't yet had bandwidth to do the actual implementation.
You are welcome to give it a shot, of course.
Contributions are always welcome.

Replies: 2 comments 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@mirceanis
Comment options

Answer selected by jrhender
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@mirceanis
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants