Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Long time to lower n-window #6556

Open
MetRonnie opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Long time to lower n-window #6556

MetRonnie opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
could be better Not exactly a bug, but not ideal. investigation
Milestone

Comments

@MetRonnie
Copy link
Member

Description

Observed a large workflow take ~ 1 minute to drop from N=3 to N=1. This was a combination of maxing out 1 CPU core on the scheduler host for a while, followed by maxing out 1 CPU core on the UI Server host for a while, while the loading spinner showed in the UI the whole time it was waiting for the subscription to update with the new N value.

image

Reproducible Example

TBC

Expected Behaviour

It doesn't seem right that dropping down the N number (leading to a relatively small number of tasks) would take so long, longer even than raising from 1 to 3.

Possibly we could also show this better in the UI.

@MetRonnie MetRonnie added the could be better Not exactly a bug, but not ideal. label Jan 14, 2025
@MetRonnie MetRonnie added this to the 8.x milestone Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
could be better Not exactly a bug, but not ideal. investigation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant