You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In particular, there's about 1% of comments that have a section heading introduction at the same time as a comment addition (same revision & timestamp, but separated into 2 actions), e.g.
{
"96983583.202.24":{
"id":"96983583.202.24",
"comment_type":"COMMENT_ADDING",
"content":" From the other notes from other Wikipedia notes, I'm not the only one who questions your judgment.",
"timestamp":"2006-12-28 19:35:53 UTC",
"status":"just added",
"page_title":"User talk:Jinxmchue",
"user_text":"Sotaman",
"parent_id":""
},
"96983583.24.24":{
"id":"96983583.24.24",
"comment_type":"SECTION_CREATION",
"content":" ==Bluffs? You see bluffs? I'll call your bluff==",
"timestamp":"2006-12-28 19:35:53 UTC",
"status":"just added",
"page_title":"User talk:Jinxmchue",
"user_text":"Sotaman",
"parent_id":""
},
"96983583.48.24":{
"id":"96983583.48.24",
"comment_type":"COMMENT_ADDING",
"content":" Here, visit this link: [EXTERNA_LINK: http://images.google.com/images?q=bluffs&ie;=UTF-8&oe;=UTF-8&rls;=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client;=firefox-a&sa;=N&tab;=wi] Then tell me you see bluffs around Montevideo, much less (as you earlier characterized them) \"spectacular\" bluffs. Sorry if my standards for geographical features are a bit higher than what's seen in your minds eye.",
"timestamp":"2006-12-28 19:35:53 UTC",
"status":"just added",
"page_title":"User talk:Jinxmchue",
"user_text":"Sotaman",
"parent_id":"96983583.24.24"
},
"97139226.240.240":{
"id":"97139226.240.240",
"comment_type":"COMMENT_ADDING",
"content":" :Higher? More like narrower. Bluffs are not just sheer cliffs. As I said, check the dictionary.",
"timestamp":"2006-12-29 14:41:34 UTC",
"status":"just added",
"page_title":"User talk:Jinxmchue",
"user_text":"Jinxmchue",
"parent_id":"96983583.202.24"
}
},
We now handle this in the JS by inferring who should be the parent, but we might want to consider doing this in the python in future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, this is actually a bug case in the reconstruction code, will fix it. The action is supposed to be divided into a title and a context edit, but the context edit should be linked to the title edit with a reply link.
In particular, there's about 1% of comments that have a section heading introduction at the same time as a comment addition (same revision & timestamp, but separated into 2 actions), e.g.
We now handle this in the JS by inferring who should be the parent, but we might want to consider doing this in the python in future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: