Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Types for extensions/custom fields #58

Open
Exotelis opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Types for extensions/custom fields #58

Exotelis opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Exotelis
Copy link

Hello,

thank you for creating this fantastic package. We've recently begun using it, and it has significantly improved our contentstack typing.

One observation we've made is that every extension/custom field currently returns the type any. Is there a possibility to implement typing for these cases too? In most instances, we know the types returned by various extensions, at least in about 99% of the cases.

@shafeeqd959
Copy link
Contributor

@Exotelis

Thank you for your valuable feedback. We recognize the importance of strong typing, and your observation regarding extension/custom field types is well noted. We'll investigate this further and prioritize adding type support for these cases in our upcoming roadmap.

@idmedia-kaiser
Copy link

Any update on this? @shafeeqd959

@cs-raj
Copy link
Contributor

cs-raj commented Jan 17, 2025

HI @idmedia-kaiser

Thank you for your patience regarding this issue. We would like to inform you that additional time is required on our end to address this matter thoroughly.

We are actively working on a fix and will provide you with an update as soon as the resolution has been released. Your understanding and cooperation are greatly appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants