Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Description for the conda-forge page #92

Open
jacobwilliams opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Description for the conda-forge page #92

jacobwilliams opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@jacobwilliams
Copy link

Comment:

Since there are so many different ways to compile IPOPT, it would be great to have a description on the conda-forge page that explains things like:

  • what compiler was used?
  • what third-party solvers and other code were used (and are there license implication of that?)
  • what compile options were used?

Probably a user could find this info in this repo somewhere? But it's hard to find.

@moorepants
Copy link
Contributor

The README here is auto-generated, so there isn't really a place for info like this. I guess you could edit the long description with some info and it would at least be packaged with the binaries.

The basic answer is that we use the compiler tool chain for conda forge that is all explained in conda forge's documentation. This varies per OS and build.

mumps is supported (and possibly paridiso if you switch to mkl instead of openblas). Those may be the only solvers we can distribute legally with conda forge's binaries.

All compile options are in the recipe in this repo.

@jacobwilliams
Copy link
Author

I was talking about the Description section here: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/ipopt

Some conda-forge packages have text there, so there should be a way to do it (i have no idea how, but could look into it).

@moorepants
Copy link
Contributor

There is a description value in the meta.yaml file.

@moorepants
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants