Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BranchDescription not properly handled in cases of merged files #47083

Open
Dr15Jones opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

BranchDescription not properly handled in cases of merged files #47083

Dr15Jones opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

The process has one and only one ProductRegistry. That registry is essentially a map of BranchKey to BranchDescriptions where a BranchDescription holds one module class type and one ParameterSetID. In the case of a merged file, it is possible that the two files might have different module class types or ParameterSetIDs for the same BranchKey. Then when the merge happens between the two files only one set is actually kept.

The relevant provenance information is not lost. Using the process name and the ProcessHistory one can get the top level ParameterSet for the associated process. From the top level ParameterSet and the module label one can then get the ParameterSet for the module which also includes information about the module class type.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign core

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: core

@Dr15Jones,@makortel,@smuzaffar you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Issue was created by @Dr15Jones.

@Dr15Jones, @antoniovilela, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants