You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
e.g. using R^2 could hint at non-specific sample loss in some samples, i.e. overall reduced reproducibility and false positive biomarkers, due to different sample handling and materials (tubes, addition of compounds, adsorption, ...). This works well only for technical replicates, since different biol. conditions might obviously not be perfectly correlated.
Reference could be the sample whose median intensity is representative (rather than using the median of each peptide, since this destroys the connection between peptides)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cbielow
changed the title
Correlation between samples
Metric: Correlation between samples
Sep 25, 2017
cbielow
changed the title
Metric: Correlation between samples
[IDEA] Metric: Correlation between samples
Nov 15, 2023
e.g. using R^2 could hint at non-specific sample loss in some samples, i.e. overall reduced reproducibility and false positive biomarkers, due to different sample handling and materials (tubes, addition of compounds, adsorption, ...). This works well only for technical replicates, since different biol. conditions might obviously not be perfectly correlated.
Reference could be the sample whose median intensity is representative (rather than using the median of each peptide, since this destroys the connection between peptides)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: