You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First off, thanks for the great project! I love it!
I often use pymc to fit GLMs with a log-link function. This means that I frequently am interested in transforming some of the variables, but not others, by applying np.exp in the plots. In order to do this I usually would then need to plot separately the log-transformed variables and those that are not. I think it would be great if transform supported a dictionary syntax, for example the following:
First off, thanks for the great project! I love it!
I often use
pymc
to fit GLMs with a log-link function. This means that I frequently am interested in transforming some of the variables, but not others, by applyingnp.exp
in the plots. In order to do this I usually would then need to plot separately the log-transformed variables and those that are not. I think it would be great if transform supported a dictionary syntax, for example the following:Now I would do something like:
Thanks!
If there is interest in this feature I'm willing to try to implement this, but may take me a while, time permitting...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: