You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we enforce a strictly linear alter-chain (history) but this may be overkill for some smaller projects. As such we should modify the current validation system to be extensible and/or interchangeable.
I can foresee allowing divergent alter-chains with optional resolutions (along the same line as the current one) with predictable mechanics for running alters. While more "risky" than a strictly linear alter-chain, it does lend itself well to small projects.
Open Questions
Is it worthwhile to go ahead and create another strategy for validation/resolution?
Is this worthwhile at all? (more research an alternative validation methods may be necessary)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we enforce a strictly linear alter-chain (history) but this may be overkill for some smaller projects. As such we should modify the current validation system to be extensible and/or interchangeable.
I can foresee allowing divergent alter-chains with optional resolutions (along the same line as the current one) with predictable mechanics for running alters. While more "risky" than a strictly linear alter-chain, it does lend itself well to small projects.
Open Questions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: