Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fine grained access control #107

Open
auniverseaway opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #108 or adobe/da-live#322
Open

Fine grained access control #107

auniverseaway opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #108 or adobe/da-live#322
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@auniverseaway
Copy link
Member

As an admin and author I would like the ability to prevent specific groups of users from performing actions so that I can sleep at night.

@auniverseaway
Copy link
Member Author

I think this is starting to take shape. Some comments based on @bosschaert's docs: https://github.com/adobe/da-live/wiki/Using-ACLs

  1. Can we set an org only group? Instead of {{human-readable-org-name}}/{{human-readable-group-name}} we just have {{human-readable-org-name}}. This is something David N had talked about... if you're a part of the org, we should default to giving everyone in the org read-only.
  2. Looks like we support multiple orgs, which I think is right.
  3. We say "actions" in the heading, but we only allow one action. I think it's fine to leave, but someone may think they can add multiple actions here.
  4. How much lift is it to support the deny pattern? Does this go against our, "no denies" commentary? I know a lot of folks talk a big game about keeping content hidden, but is this a real use case?

I think the overwhelming majority of sites are going to look like this:

/site/ + *              | {{org-name}}                 | read
/site/ + *              | {{org-name}}/{{group-name}}  | write
/site/drafts/*          | {{org-name}}                 | write

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants