Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Could you please share the checkpoints of the downscaling results in paper? #124

Open
Teenye opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@Teenye
Copy link

Teenye commented Sep 20, 2024

I would like to know if the downscale experiment only used data from three variables (z500,t850,t2m with a time interval of 6 hours) for training from 1979 to 2015, validation period in 2016, and testing periods in 2017 and 2018? Can you provide checkpoints for the method results in the paper。

@Teenye Teenye added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 20, 2024
@jasonjewik
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @Teenye, thank you for your interest in our work. Since I am left @aditya-grover's lab a year ago, I do not have access to the machines which contained the checkpoints. @tung-nd do you know if the checkpoints are still available?

@Teenye
Copy link
Author

Teenye commented Sep 25, 2024

Thank you for your response. I tried running the code for climatelearn to do a downscaling experiment, but the results were still far inferior to those in the paper. I would like to confirm if the dataset configuration for the experiment I am referring to is correct, with three variables (z500, t850,t2m with a time interval of 1 hour) for training from 1979 to 2015, validation period in 2016, and testing periods in 2017 and 2018? Is the time interval 1 hour or 6 hours?

@Teenye
Copy link
Author

Teenye commented Oct 11, 2024

Hello, may I ask for your advice again. Because I saw in the code that t2m, z500, and t850 were used as input variables, and the output was only one variable (selected from three), is the result of the article actually training a model for each of these three variables separately?

@jasonjewik
Copy link
Collaborator

@Teenye as far as I recall... this is correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants