We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be nice to be to defined route groups, each group would get exported to a different file.
I'd personally find it handy since it wouldn't expose urls i use in the admin to the general users.
Config Add a groups array, the keys in that array would be the group names, while the value would map to the filename/location
Route definition
Map default group:
'laroute' => true
Map to a defined group:
'laroute' =>'groupName'
Doing it this way would be backwards-compatible.
If you need help implementing this I'm willing to submit a PR
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#66
Sorry, something went wrong.
@ctf0 why are you referencing your pull request? This issue isn't about ignoring routes, but grouping them
sorry, thought u wanted to ignore routes by group, my bad
No branches or pull requests
It would be nice to be to defined route groups, each group would get exported to a different file.
I'd personally find it handy since it wouldn't expose urls i use in the admin to the general users.
Config
Add a groups array, the keys in that array would be the group names, while the value would map to the filename/location
Route definition
Map default group:
Map to a defined group:
Doing it this way would be backwards-compatible.
If you need help implementing this I'm willing to submit a PR
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: