-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 974
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TigerVNC viewer is very slow when stretched over two 32" 4K Monitors #1747
Comments
Thank you for your bug report. If even the cursor is slow, then it sounds like the base OS is overloaded somehow. Given that this is a dock, the outputs might be driven using a USB graphics card rather than a "normal" one. Those can unfortunately easily be overwhelmed. Do you have the same issue if the monitor is hooked up directly to the computer? |
I’ve tried this with a single monitor hooked up directly to the Mac using a
DP-Thunderbolt4 cable and I feel the same slowness in the VNC.
Thanks
Sooraj
…On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 12:30 AM, Pierre Ossman (ThinLinc team) < ***@***.***> wrote:
Thank you for your bug report.
If even the cursor is slow, then it sounds like the base OS is overloaded
somehow. Given that this is a dock, the outputs might be driven using a USB
graphics card rather than a "normal" one. Those can unfortunately easily be
overwhelmed.
Do you have the same issue if the monitor is hooked up directly to the
computer?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1747 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BH3KPYTIEZ2EOAAPBLJT2MLY5THRVAVCNFSM6AAAAABGITW3LWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANJYGQZDAOJWGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and
destroy any printed copy of it.
|
Any update on this? |
Is there a specific memory and # of cores that you recommend for the vncserver to support a tigerVnc window extended over two 32" 4K display resolution? Is there an optimum config for this and also something good to have? |
I just noticed that the server is extremely old. The issue might simply be that it fails to keep up. Can you try TigerVNC 1.13.1 instead? TigerVNC doesn't require a lot of memory, and the server is single threaded. Running two 4K screens with a lot of updates is demanding, though, so you'll need a fast CPU for a good experience. Which desktop environment are you using? If it's the default GNOME, then it will likely not perform smoothly in such a scenario as it is designed with GPU acceleration in minde. |
Describe the bug
I've a Mac M1 Max 32GB Memory, running on Sonoma 14.4.1 and hooked up to two Dell 32" 4K monitors through an OWC Thunderbolt4 dock (DP->Thunderbolt4 cable). I've no issues running applications other than tigerVNC. Issues are when the tigerVNC window is stretched over one of the monitors with 4k resolution (3839x2132). Anything in the VNC session becomes really slow. I mainly use this for hardware design and my tool runs really slow in it; i could really see the pointer in the VNC lagging behind the native curser in the Mac. Also navigating in the VNC session becomes really difficult as everything gets really slow. Issues get even worse when the window is stretched over 2 monitors in 4K resolution (7680x2132). If i stretch the VNC window to occupy only the quarter area of a single 4K monitor, i see a considerable performance change (gets better); at this kind of a reduced window size, the VNC resolution is automatically adjusted to 1920x1080. Also, i tried changing the 4K monitors resolution to 1080p; even that gets a better performance. But the issue is everything in the VNC gets too large and its not a friendly working setup.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Expecting nothing to get slower in the VNC session and expecting the mouse pointer in the VNC to closely follow the native curser when the mouse is moved around.
Screenshots
I can share a video of this issue if that help (later if really needed)
Client (please complete the following information):
Server (please complete the following information):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: