Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Group findings #377

Open
aronmolnar opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Group findings #377

aronmolnar opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@aronmolnar
Copy link
Contributor

All findings are currently added to one flat list, both in the web UI, and in the findings variable that can be used in the project design HTML.

{38F4240C-C7B1-4A61-A20B-E34BB04329D6}

For some use cases, pentesters want to group certain findings (e.g., if the pentest included two different applications, etc.). We currently allow manual sorting of findings. Pentesters could add a finding field like section or group and insert headings in the project design correspondingly.
This is, however, cumbersome and more difficult to implement.

We, therefore, want to introduce the possibility to manually add sections between findings. We will probably introduce this as a finding field, that is then also rendered in the web UI correctly. Drag and drop of findings between sections should also be possible (also if default finding ordering is enabled).

We should leave the current findings variable in the project design as a flat list to be backwards-compatible. We might introduce a new variable (like finding_groups) which might be a dictionary with the group name as the key and the list of findings.

This would make grouping findings easier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant