Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Extract plan features #55094

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

murphyatwork
Copy link
Contributor

@murphyatwork murphyatwork commented Jan 15, 2025

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Extract plan features into fe.features.log.

Fixes #55096

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.4
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0

@murphyatwork murphyatwork requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2025 05:05
Signed-off-by: Murphy <[email protected]>
Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 29 / 34 (85.29%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/common/AuditLog.java 0 2 00.00% [62, 63]
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/operator/physical/PhysicalOlapScanOperator.java 1 4 25.00% [144, 145, 146]
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/Optimizer.java 7 7 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/plugin/AuditEvent.java 2 2 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/common/Log4jConfig.java 9 9 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/Explain.java 2 2 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/operator/OperatorType.java 3 3 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/cost/CostModel.java 5 5 100.00% []

Signed-off-by: Murphy <[email protected]>
satanson
satanson previously approved these changes Jan 15, 2025
// ScanOperator use a ChunkBuffer to implement async-io, which may takes significant memory for certain
// cases
SessionVariable variables = ConnectContext.get().getSessionVariable();
double memCost = (double) statistics.getAvgRowSize() * variables.getDegreeOfParallelism();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to multiply by the bytes of each row of data?

Copy link

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Plan Feature Extraction
3 participants