-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
/annotate
#248
Comments
Note The following contributors may be suitable for this task: shiv810
Keyrxng
|
/ask I wonder if there is a more suitable command name instead of annotate which will make more sense for a global search as the default. Please provide some options. |
Certainly! Choosing a command name that clearly conveys its purpose can enhance usability and user understanding. Here are several alternative command names to replace
Recommendation: Choose a command name that best aligns with the primary functionality and resonates with your team's terminology. For instance, if the emphasis is on linking related issues, Implementing one of these alternatives can enhance clarity and ensure that users intuitively understand the command's purpose, thereby improving overall efficiency in managing and referencing issues within your projects. |
/ask could you help me making a plan for solving this issue? |
Certainly! Here's a structured plan to address Issue #248 regarding enhancing issue referencing using vector embeddings: 1. Define Objectives and Requirements
2. Design the Solution
3. Develop the Implementation
4. Testing
5. Deployment
6. Documentation and Training
7. Monitoring and Feedback
8. Address Potential Challenges
By following this comprehensive plan, you can effectively implement the enhanced issue referencing feature, ensuring it is robust, user-friendly, and integrates seamlessly with your existing infrastructure. |
There are situations where we write about certain issues that were likely to have been posted in the past, but are difficult to find.
Imagine if using vector embeddings, we can instantly link to whatever issues are being referenced:
From https://www.github.com/kingsley-einstein/contributions-scan/pull/4#issuecomment-2577468623
Using this command, we should replicate the behavior of issue deduplication on the existing comment and edit/add the footnotes with links to the source issues.
A limitation that I see is how wide of a search we should conduct. 1 Within the same repository is somewhat useless, and globally might incur too much noise.
Organization wide might be the best default, but sometimes it would be very useful, especially for us using three organizations, to do a global annotation/search.
Perhaps we can have optional arguments to scope the search.
But default can be just
And it will automatically annotate the previous comment with an organization wide search.
Footnotes
⚠ 73% possible duplicate - Implement ubiquity-os logger instead of console logs ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: