You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a chance, to classifiy all libraries, that are in no production dependency as development dependency ?
Reason is, that i would not like to have a CC-BY-SA depencency in my production source, but i do not have a problem to do the test and development with additional CC-BY-SA Tools.
TheFive (aka Christoph)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
late response, but finally I read your question. I like the idea, but currently I can't tell how complex this would be.
As you might have read, the code of this tool was originally not done by me and still today, I don't know everything it does and how it does it by heart.
It would be a good new feature. we'll see, unless you or someone else will create a PR for it, I'll put it on my todo list.
HI,
what is the definition of development module in your license checker.
currently i have the situation that
caniuse
is shown as production dependency in this situationIn this case
@ladis/consolidate
is using@babel/core
as development depencency.@babel/core
is only imported as development dependency:(nyc is a development depencendy in my program).
Is there a chance, to classifiy all libraries, that are in no production dependency as development dependency ?
Reason is, that i would not like to have a CC-BY-SA depencency in my production source, but i do not have a problem to do the test and development with additional CC-BY-SA Tools.
TheFive (aka Christoph)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: